Alabama Music Educators Association — January 21-23, 1999, Tuscaloosa, AL
Introduction and Thanks
- Pearl, Zildjian, Vic Firth, AMEA (Tony Pike)
- University of Alabama Percussion (Jason Dyhouse), Neal Flum
Neal Flum’s Paper
- Questions and perspectives
- The premise is “there will be disagreement”
The Traditions
- Military Band and Show Band influences
- functional part writing
- pulse and tempo
- large phrase concepts/form
- rhythmic contribution
- Transitional Phase
- less patterned
- technically driven
- variation
- Corps Style and Contemporary Marching Band influences
- musically driven with an ensemble orchestration
- orchestral qualities
- melodic contributions (pit and battery)
Instrumentation
- battery ensemble = SATB (choir)
- pit ensemble = concert percussion ensemble
- keyboard choir
- timpani as bass voice
- bass drums, concert toms, concert snare, gongs, cymbals, chimes
- hand percussion and accessories
Hoedown (Copland)
- Beginning-39… musical devices
- imitation and voice leading
- melodic reinforcement
- texturing and timbre
- dynamic contour and contrast
- pit as the lead voice
- Measures 39-79
- melodic punctuation
- melodic reinforcement/quads lead voice
- ostinato @ 47
- segmental features @ 55
- tutti @ 71 (tradeoff)
Orchestration
- Percussion Orchestration Tips (handout)
- Phrase Chart – creating a plan (Hoedown)
- identify phrases
- define their function
- tempi, dynamic shape
- establish the lead voice
Music for Strings, Percussion, and Celesta (Bartok)
- scores & recording
- notation and detailing
- where do we go from here?
- use of electronics
Concluding Remarks
- Question: Are your arrangements more musically driven, or technically motivated?
- Goal: Create an arrangement which generates effect and emotion, while maintaining musical integrity.
- Clarity is the key to effective communication!
- To evaluate: Close your eyes and listen, avoid visual distractions.